Gente Che Gioca > Segnalazioni e News
Aperto l'Adept Press forum!
Alessandro Piroddi (Hasimir):
postato u_u
Zachiel:
Ora so di essere una Typhoid Mary.
Vado a scrivere un libro, che è meglio.
Alessandro Piroddi (Hasimir):
--- Citazione da: Zachiel - 2012-07-14 21:52:27 ---Ora so di essere una Typhoid Mary.
Vado a scrivere un libro, che è meglio.
--- Termina citazione ---
o_O ?
Moreno Roncucci:
--- Citazione da: Zachiel - 2012-07-14 21:52:27 ---Ora so di essere una Typhoid Mary.
Vado a scrivere un libro, che è meglio.
--- Termina citazione ---
Sì, se effettivamente la tua maniera di giocare è ancora questa, direi che è meglio... 8)
"You may have run into the GM who loves his or her story so much, wants to see his or her story appear so much, wants to be praised for his or her awesome story so much ... and the problem is, you have to guess what the story is as you go along, and play it out like they want, or they're bummed out. Or worse, you don't even have to guess because they send cues at you a blind toad-man could read, and you have to follow those cues, or they're bummed out. Substitute "bummed out" with "resentful" or worse.
This is what people are complaining about when they say, "I don't want to have to violate my character to make a story." Taken at face value, that makes no sense: a plot results specifically from the actions of characters, after all. But when you're doing time in a Typhoid Mary's game, then yeah, someone with a story in mind is demanding that everyone else subordinate their characters to his or her intentions."
Per fortuna non è mai troppo tardi per cambiare e smettere di essere una Typhoid Mary... 8)
(per chi non sa da dove viene il termine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhoid_Mary )
Questa pagine è un buon esempio della funzione del wiki: ecco com'era la definizione del glossario provvisorio:
"One person, typically the GM in a traditional GM/players construction of play, makes it impossible for anyone at the table to play with a Story Now agenda except for him or her, often greatly desiring for such play to seem as emergent as possible. Armed with a variety of Force techniques, as well as any number of misconceptions about The GM and The Story, this person tries to make all the characters' significant decisions for them (De-Protagonizing, specifically Railroading), and perhaps with ostensible commitment to The Impossible Thing Before Breakfast.
This is not a case of Agenda Clash, nor of Techniques Preferences (although both may compound the problem), but simply a Dysfunctional, self-defeating failure of technique that originates in the crucial "Let's play this game together" component of Social Contract. The Typhoid Mary is trying to play Story Now, but they are mistakenly determined to ensure that the other people at the table don't screw it up, for example by playing their characters as they'd prefer to play them."
Notata la differenza? 8)
Zachiel:
Ma non è affatto meglio, il mio egocentrismo non ne esce soddisfatto!
Comunque, approvo grandemente l'idea di fare una versione facilmente leggibile della teoria, per i profani.
Magari non è ugualmente utile, ma è sicuramente una lettura più veloce.
Navigazione
[0] Indice dei post
Vai alla versione completa